One of the more difficult problems the world faces when trying to combat climate change is that fact that climate issues are a not just of local concern. Even with global-minded goals like those set out in the Paris Agreement in 2016, countries ultimately are in charge of enforcing those rules. Europe is a great case study of how individual countries' decisions can ultimately have an effect on those around them because of the small size and connectedness of the countries. The map, graph and analysis below explore how European Union counties have fared in combating a series of environmental issues.
For this project, the focus is mainly on data on a per capita basis, with the exception of air quality. Countries with a larger population will naturally have higher levels of waste and energy use, so the intention is to look at how each county is managing environmental issues despite population differences. Air Quality is an average across each country as this is much less easily measured per capita.
Below are some explanations on why countries fair better or worse in certain categories. Helpful background information was provided by Eurostat's Statistics Explained guides, linked in the reference sources section.
Looking at each of the five variables presented above, it is possible to create a ranking of which country fares best, while acknowledging that there are many other variables not included here that certainly factor in.
Below is a table showing each of the categories and a final ranking. Lower numbers indicate a more environmentally friendly rank:
Country | Greenhouse Gases | Waste | Air Quality | Non-Renewable Energy | Water Extraction | Total Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Latvia | 5 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 27 |
Lithuania | 10 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 32 |
Croatia | 3 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 9 | 41 |
Portugal | 8 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 43 |
Malta | 2 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 48 |
Denmark | 16 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 51 |
Sweden | 1 | 24 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 55 |
United Kingdom | 12 | 14 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 55 |
Romania | 4 | 23 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 63 |
Spain | 11 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 24 | 63 |
Luxembourg | 28 | 25 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 68 |
Slovakia | 13 | 5 | 26 | 20 | 4 | 68 |
Hungary | 6 | 4 | 21 | 21 | 17 | 69 |
Ireland | 26 | 11 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 72 |
Austria | 18 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 19 | 77 |
Cyprus | 23 | 8 | 24 | 11 | 11 | 77 |
France | 7 | 18 | 11 | 23 | 18 | 77 |
Italy | 9 | 10 | 20 | 12 | 27 | 78 |
Czechia | 25 | 7 | 19 | 24 | 8 | 83 |
Germany | 20 | 17 | 12 | 22 | 13 | 84 |
Slovenia | 15 | 13 | 23 | 17 | 20 | 88 |
Greece | 17 | 15 | 22 | 10 | 26 | 90 |
Poland | 22 | 16 | 28 | 19 | 12 | 97 |
Belgium | 21 | 20 | 16 | 26 | 16 | 99 |
Finland | 19 | 28 | 1 | 28 | 23 | 99 |
Netherlands | 24 | 22 | 13 | 25 | 22 | 106 |
Bulgaria | 14 | 27 | 27 | 16 | 25 | 109 |
Estonia | 27 | 26 | 3 | 27 | 28 | 111 |
The countries that faired best in this ranking were two of the Baltic nations, Latvia and Lithuania. Both of these countries (along with other high on the list) have made Renewable Energy a priority. Other categories such as waste and greenhouse gases likely have a ripple effect on these choices. In contrast, the other Baltic nation, Estonia, ends up last in these rankings due to its very waste-heavy and resource intensive oil shale industry. Like the other nations at the bottom, failure to change their dependence on non-renewable energy has serious conseqences for their attempts to be more environmentally friendly.
Greenhouse Gases: Eurostat, Greenhouse gas emissions per capita, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/T2020_RD300
Total Waste: Eurostat, Generation of waste by waste category, hazardousness and NACE Rev. 2 activity, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/env_wasgen
Air Quality: World Health Organization, Concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), 2016. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/concentrations-of-fine-particulate-matter-(pm2-5)
Non-Renewable Energy: (Derived from two sources): United Nations, Energy supply per capita, 2017 and Renewable Electricity production, 2017. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envstats/qindicators
Freshwater Extractions: Eurostat, Annual freshwater abstraction by source and sector, Avg 2015-2017 (All data except Italy, Austria and Finland). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-datasets/-/ENV_WAT_ABS
Freshwater Extractions: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Freshwater abstractions (million m3). Data for Italy (1980), Austria (1995), Finland (1995). https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=WATER_ABSTRACT
Greenhouse Gases: https://www.greenmatch.co.uk/blog/2019/10/greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-country
Total Waste: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Waste_statistics
Air Quality: https://www.dw.com/en/where-is-europes-air-safe-to-breathe/a-46189571
Non-Renewable Energy: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Energy_statistics_-_an_overview#Primary_energy_production
Non-Renewable Energy: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics
Freshwater Extractions: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Water_statistics#Water_uses
Created by Greg Grube for Geography 575 at University of Wisconsin - Madison. Fall 2020.